Journal

3 NEWSLETTERS THAT LIGHT UP MY LIFE

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE!!!!!!

Newsletters are everywhere these days, and a lot of them require subscribers to pay for their content beyond a few free articles a month. Heck, even *I* technically have one (shameless pitch!), though I’m still developing how I want it to work and what my readers would find most interesting. 

But-! Despite the ubiquity of newsletters flooding the internet, there are a few I subscribe to that literally make my heart do a little joyous flip-flop when I see them in my inbox. They run the gamut of subjects, from writing to minimalism to task management to entrepreneurship to fashion and beauty, but these three are newsletters I almost always read cover-to-cover: a rare thing in these short-attention-span days!

1) JESSICA DEFINO: THE REVIEW OF BEAUTY

I absolutely adore Jessica DeFino’s “The Review of Beauty,” which is all about pushing back on the cosmetic/beauty industry’s aggressive marketing and its affect on people financially, psychologically, and emotionally. I’m a closet fashion obsessive, in part because I am so not fashionable and never have been. I don’t wear any makeup, in part because my skin’s sensitive and I react strongly (and itch-ily) to sparkly substances in makeups (think shimmery eyeshadow—oh so pretty! Oh, so painful!), but also in part because a long time ago, I decided that I hated feeling “ugly” when I wasn’t wearing makeup. I never wanted to look at my plain face, my real, human face, and think: ugh, I look like shit. 

So while now and then I’ll rock a lipstick or tinted lipgloss, and when I’m being *really* fancy, I wear eyeliner and mascara and maybe a bit of brow tint, I otherwise avoid it 95% of the time. But THE REVIEW OF BEAUTY is not just brilliant journalism and food for thought, it’s also goshed-darned funny and often makes me laugh out loud. 

2) LINCOLN MICHEL: COUNTER CRAFT

I’m also OBSESSED with Lincoln Michel’s Counter Craft newsletter. This one should be on EVERY writer’s list of newsletters to read, in my opinion, in part because they feel more like in-depth lectures (and good ones) on subjects ranging from non-linear storytelling structures to surrealism to the culture of publishing. He’s thoughtful and insightful, and every book I’ve bought at his recommendation has been an absolute delight to read. I also blame him for finally watching David Lynch’s ERASERHEAD, which now lives rent-free in my head. 

Every time this newsletter rolls into my inbox (which is probably twice a month), I set aside time to just read it in-full, because it’s always engaging and I always learn something, and my to-read list gets longer (though his recs usually jump the list). If you like weird fiction, experimental fiction, strange fiction, literary oddball fiction—literally anything that pushes the boundaries of what you can and can’t do in writing and in reality, I highly recommend checking this one out. I read it for some months for free, but it was so good and I looked forward to reading it so much, it was one of the first newsletters I signed on for a paid subscription for. 

3) @REBECCAWRITES:  YOUR HOUSE MACHINE

And on a completely different subject, my third favorite is Your House Machine by @rebeccawrites. It’s all about home optimization, organization, and creating functional systems. I love her systems-oriented perspective on house function, seeing your home as a piece of machinery that should support your life, not hinder it. It’s lacking some of the more eye-rolling organization “hacks” that end up just making life more complicated for the sake of aesthetics (not that I don’t love a pretty looking space!), and really zeroes in on creating functional systems to manage life, the universe, and everything. I’m always picking up thoughtful tips for making my non-writing life just a little bit easier (because I seriously don’t want to think about housework more than I absolutely have to). Tired of cluttered spaces, piles of laundry, and never finding your keys? This is the newsletter for you!  

RUNNERS UP————————————————-

Here’s a couple other newsletters that rock my socks, even if I don’t *always* read them from beginning to end: 

THE CREATIVE INDEPENDENT

I love this newsletter, even though it’s a daily, and let’s be honest, there are just times I don’t have time to intake a long, in-depth interview. That said, this newsletter has introduced me to NUMEROUS artists, musicians, and writers I now obsessively adore that I never would have encountered without it. The interviews are great, focusing on the creative process and living in a capitalist-driven society while trying to make art. If you don’t have time for a deep-dive on each artist, check out their Instagram page, from which I regularly screenshot bits of advice and process thinking to put in my notebooks. One of my favorite things about the interviews is their “list of five” at the end of each, in which the interviewee lists five things they can’t live without/want to share with the world. Another goldmine for great things to try and check out!

OFFICE HOURS – GEORGE SAUNDERS

While I don’t participate in George Saunders’ STORY CLUB, I do enjoy his regular Office Hours newsletter, which is something of a Q & A with write-in questions from readers, and some are just thoughts on how writing works and what a writer is trying to do. While, again, I don’t always read every line of these depending on my interest in the question posed, more often than not, I’ve found some shred of insight or creative process thought to chew on that lingers days afterwards. 

Journal

CALVARIA FELL: An Interview with authors Kaaron Warren and Cat Sparks!

I have admired Kaaron Warren and Cat Sparks as writers for years, so when I got the opportunity to interview them for this blog, I jumped at the chance! Their new book, Calvaria Fell, is a collection of short fiction (and one novella) presents a deliciously dark future, filled with invasive plastic, faux paradises, abandoned malls, spy networks tucked amongst citizen enclaves, and manipulative experimentation, all wrapped up in the kindness and cruelty humanity has to offer to itself. Swinging from tender to horrifying, there’s a story here for anyone whose reading tastes lean towards the dark, the dystopian, and the weird, with a healthy serving of contemplative speculation that will leave you thinking long after you leave the pages.

What does Calvaria mean, you ask?

The title of the collection tethers these stories to a shared space. The calvaria is the top part of the skull, comprising five plates that fuse together in the first few years of life. Story collections work like this; disparate parts melding together to make a robust and sturdy whole. The calvaria tree, also known as the dodo tree, adapted to being eaten by the now-extinct dodo bird; its seeds need to pass through the bird’ s digestive tract in order to germinate. In a similar way, the stories in Calvaria Fell reflect the idea of adaptation and the consequences of our actions in a changing world.

–Meerkat Press

Pick up your copy of Calvaria Fell at  Meerkat Press Bookshop.org | Amazon and enter Meerkat Press’ $25 Gift Card Giveaway contest here! In the meantime, please enjoy this interview with Cat and Kaaron!

QUESTIONS ABOUT CALVARIA FELL

Thank you so much for participating in this interview! First off, I’d love to know more about how this project came about. A dual-author collection of short stories is such a unique and fun idea, and your styles blend so beautifully. What was the spark that made you take on this project together?

We’ve been reading and editing each other’s work for as long as we’ve known each other. We met when Cat bought a story from Kaaron, and while we’ve often worked in different genres and arenas, at heart our stories explore similar themes of human behaviour and consequences.

A couple of years ago, we both had stories we considered complete, set in self-contained worlds but with questions raised about what happens outside these worlds. We realised that Cat’s short story “Some Kind of Indescribable”, and Kaaron’s novella “The Emporium” somehow seemed to inhabit that ‘outside’ space, answering those questions to a certain degree.

We talked about some of the new stories Cat was working on, and realised that we’d somehow over the years been working at times in the same kind of near future, with similar landscapes and projected futures, with at the same time a kind hope running through it relying on humanity to look after its own.

We were working in a second-hand shop together, a wonderful place where hundreds of interesting and unusual items came in every week, all of them bringing a past and a possible future. Many of these items ended up in our stories, because we believe that many items hold a lot of community weight and significance even if they have lost their history. We explored these items in detail, because it is in the detail where people are at their best. Focusing on the smaller picture.

When you were writing the stories for CALVARIA FELL, did you work explicitly on your own stories or did you edit each other’s work or plan them together? What kind of things are considered and weighted to create cohesion between the stories?

We wrote them separately and stitched them together as a whole, although Cat wrote “Doll Face” with the rest of the collection in mind. 

It was in the selection of stories where the consideration and weight took place. For Kaaron, it was choosing those of her stories that were more SF than horror, and for Cat it was selecting stories that leaned towards the horror end of SF. The ‘meeting of the minds’ is what brings cohesiveness to the collection.

Climate destruction runs through it all, and that is intentional.

Placement was organic, in that one story seemed to flow into the next. 

One of the things I appreciated about this collection was how all the stories managed to create this deep sense of dread and distrust, particularly regarding giant corporations, new tech run amok, climate change, and inequality. It’s a feeling I think a lot of people are having these days. Given the state of the world today, what scares you the most right now?

All of it. Humanity’s own inertia in response to scientific advice is terrifying. Current catastrophic threats to life on this planet include: global heating, environmental decline and extinction, nuclear weapons, resource scarcity, food insecurity, dangerous new technologies, chemical pollution, pandemic disease, and denial and misinformation – all of which are happening at once. Humanity is utterly failing in its self-appointed stewardship of the only planet so far proven to support any form of life, let alone the complex or sentient. Yet here we are, cranking out new coal and gas fired power stations, despite scientists assuring us we have to switch to renewables asap or else suffer dire consequences – such as the actual end of our civilisations.

Do you each have a favorite story from the collection, or a scene in a story that you found particularly resonant? Since it’s a dual collection, which was your favorite contribution to the book and which story is your favorite of your co-author’s?

Cat: My favourite story of Kaaron’s is ‘Witnessing’, with its use of gang members as low-tech surveillance devices. Her stories are riddled with small scale domestic grade horrors. Reading them is like being stabbed randomly with a fork throughout an otherwise civilized dinner party.

My favourite of my own is ‘Hacking Santorini’, written in response to a visit there a few years back. When the friend I stayed with read the story she said something along the lines of how the hell did you make this thing out of that place?

Kaaron: It’s hard to choose a favourite from a group of stories selected so carefully! But the novella The Emporium is one of those that sang out to me and demanded to be written. Set in part in the shopping mall in the suburb I grew up in, and inspired deeply by my work at the second-hand shop, I’m really happy with the end result and with the characters I filled that mall with. I love all of Cat’s stories, too, but my favourite is “Hacking Santorini” because of its obsessive attention to object detail and the way those things are absorbed and inform the story. The underlying humorous tone lends a positive feel to a dark SF story, and the story itself takes me by surprise every time I read it.

What do you feel is the most important thing for readers of CALVARIA FELL to bring away from the book with them? What do you hope they see or take with them to continue thinking about? 

The human experience is an intricate weave of macro and micro events with random elements scattershot throughout. As individuals, few of us have power to fight for or against major catastrophe – it’s how we respond that matters. Our true strength lies in community and the bonds we make within. Ten thousand years of agricultural settlement have left us in a precarious global position. Survival depends upon us embracing the ecosystems of which we are a part rather than just attempting to profit from them.

QUESTIONS ABOUT WRITING IN GENERAL

Building dread is such an artform, and you do it so well in CALVARIA FELL. Each story has an underlying tension of uncertainty about the future and the secrets we keep, both to protect others and to protect ourselves. What do you think about or need to be aware of when you’re conjuring dread in your prose? What do you think makes for the best evocation of that emotion in readers?

Kaaron: One of the most important things about building dread for me is that it shouldn’t be unrelenting. If a story is only dark and dread-filled, the reader will turn off. You need lighter moments, and you need to ensure your characters are real on the page. This is what makes the best evocation. If the reader can relate to, understand, or sympathise with the characters, the emotion will be stronger.

Most people will want moments of relief, even in the worst of circumstances. In a way I see it as a release valve, to stop pressure building up and keep heads clearer. Dread in story is the same; you need to release the pressure every now and then.

Cat: For me, dread is best evoked through hint and tone, then maintained through rhythm. Less is definitely more. The author plants seeds and the reader experiences things sprouting uncomfortably in their peripheral vision.

Finding the time and motivation to get one’s writing done can be a challenge for writers, so I’m curious about your writing routines. Do you have a typical routine for getting your work done, or not so much? How has your approach to making time for your art changed over the years?

Cat: Back when I was in full-time employment with very little free time, I wrote heaps because I had to fight for writing time and space, making every sentence expensive and therefore valuable in terms of emotional labour. Theoretically I have buckets of ‘free time’ now – the challenge has become about stealing precious hours away from domestic responsibilities and visual arts, my other hardcore area of interest. For me, writing has always been challenging and it’s not getting any easier as I get older. No routines that seem to stick, just a burning urge to be part of the global speculative conversation.

Kaaron: I’ve had so many variations in my writing practice! From typing on an electric typewriter while hour-long tapes copied when I ran an editing studio in an advertising agency, to working part time and writing in the afternoons, to having my children and snatching ten minutes here and there to work, to living in Fiji for three years and devoting most of my time there to completing three novels, to working part time again and writing the rest of the time, to writing full time again! Throughout it all what has driven me is a need to get words on the page. To explore the ideas that press forward, and to interpret the things that upset me or terrify me into a story.

Now that CALVARIA FELL is out in the world, what’s next for the both of you? What project is calling your name (if you can talk about it)?

Kaaron: I have a novel out called The Underhistory, a home-invasion meets haunted  house story. I’m working on my next novel, another crime novel, inspired by the hundreds of magazine articles and newspaper clippings I’ve collected over the years.

Cat: I’m working on a new novel, as yet untitled, set in London, Berlin, Australia and a swathe of no man’s land at the point where climate crisis and AI Singularity slam up against each other. Loads of research going into this one – my protagonist is a climate activist. We need more stories about activism as antidote to apathy and despair.

A COUPLE FUN QUESTIONS

I’m always looking for new things to read, so I’ve got to ask: what are you currently reading? What novel or short story has really excited you recently? Any nonfiction books really blown your mind lately?

Cat: I recently finished The Mountain in the Sea and The Tusks of Extinction by Ray Nayler and loved them both. Currently reading The Future We Choose – The Stubborn Optimist’s Guide to the Climate Crisis by Christiana Figueres & Tom Rivett-Carnac & I’m looking forward to Deep Water: The World in the Ocean by James Bradley next.

Kaaron: I’m reading up for some crime conventions in the UK in May, so discovering writers like Syd Moore, Natalie Marlow and Caroline England. 

A non-fiction book that is blowing my mind is “Gilles de Rais, The Authentic Bluebeard” by Jean Benedetti. I’ve always quoted the fairy tale Bluebeard as an early inspiration for me as a horror writer, so reading this biography of a mass murderer, starting from his life as a child, is utterly fascinating.

If you could choose one fictional character to spend an afternoon with, who would you choose and what would you spend your time doing?

Cat: Rather than pick a character, I’d like to pick a world – the fantastically tweaked landscapes of Les Coureurs in Dave Hutchinson’s Fractured Europe sequence. What would I be doing? It’s complicated…

Kaaron: I’m going to cheat a bit and name Pera Sinclair, the main character in my novel The Underhistory. She would be great fun to hang out with and have lots of stories to tell. She also makes a good scone.

– O –

ABOUT THE AUTHORS: 

Cat Sparks is a multi-award-winning Australian author, editor and artist. Career highlights include a PhD in science fiction and climate fiction, five years as Fiction Editor of Cosmos Magazine, running Agog! Press, working as an archaeological dig photographer in Jordan, studying with Margaret Atwood, 78 published short stories, two collections— The Bride Price (2013) and Dark Harvest (2020) and a far future novel, Lotus Blue. She directed two speculative fiction festivals for Writing NSW and is a regular panelist & speaker at speculative fiction and other literary events.

Kaaron Warren has been publishing ground-breaking fiction for over twenty years. Her novels and short stories have won over 20 awards, from local literary to international genre. She writes horror steeped in awful reality, with ghosts, hauntings, guilt, loss, love, crime, punishment and a lack of hope.

Book Thoughts

Book Thoughts: Show Your Work! by Austin Kleon

A year or so ago I read Austin Kleon‘s book Steal Like an Artist, and found it interesting but not as inspiring as I’d hoped. To be fair, I’d also just read The Accidental Creative by Todd Henry, and that book had struck me with its actionable methods for generating and developing ideas. Not all of it was pertinent to my needs (Henry’s book is geared towards professional and marketing business creatives, less so to writers), but a lot of the advice and suggestions were applicable to creative writing, too.

Show Your Work, however, felt fresh and invigorating to me. It tackles a subject I loathe personally, which is how to network and share your work without seeming spammy or self-obsessed. Let’s be honest, self promotion STINKS. I hate it. But what I liked about Show Your Work is that it seems to be exactly what some of my favorite artists online already do: share their processes, their WIP, and their loves and inspirations. Show Your Work did a great job of reminding me that being online and sharing what I do and what I love can be fun, too.

For the last month or so, I’ve been really pulled back from the internet. I read the ah-maz-ing Four Thousand Weeks by Oliver Burkeman, which deserves its own blog post entirely, because it blew my mind in the best of ways, but it kicked off a desperate desire to slow things down and focus on the physical life around me. It was great. I then topped off the tanks with Digital Minimalism by Cal Newport (which also deserves its own post, because while some of it I found very interesting, some of it directly contradicted what felt most helpful in Four Thousand Weeks, particularly in the area of how you *should* spend your free time), which just made me even less interested in reconnecting online.

Yet in the midst of all that, I got a chance to evaluate what online activities I actually enjoyed and found most useful personally. This blog is definitely one of them, and I found I enjoy sharing things on Instagram too (though I finally figured out how turn off the “Like” counters so I can’t see how many people liked (or didn’t!) a post, which helps me focus on the sharing aspect, and less on the “earning likes” side, which I hate). This was a great book to help me get back on the horse, while making sure I was sharing only what I *actually* wanted to share, and that I was having fun doing it.

Notable Thoughts:

Over the years, you will be tempted to abandon [your website] for the newest, shiniest social network. Don’t give in. Don’t let it fall into neglect. Think about it in the long term. Stick with it, maintain it, and let it change with you over time.”

Show Your Work, Austen Kleon (69)

^ ^ ^

Stop worrying about how many people follow you online and start worrying about the quality of people who follow you. Don’t waste your time reading articles about how to get more followers. Don’t waste time following people online just because you think it’ll get you somewhere. Don’t talk to people you don’t want to talk to, and don’t talk about stuff you don’t want to talk about.”

Show Your Work, Austen Kleon (129)

^ ^ ^

Add all this together and you get a way of working I call chain-smoking. You avoid stalling out in your career by never losing momentum. Here’s how you do it: Instead of taking a break in between projects, waiting for feedback, and worrying about what’s next, use the end of one project to light up the next one. Just do the work that’s in front of you, and when it’s finished, ask yourself what you missed, what you could’ve done better, or what you couldn’t get to, and jump right into the next project.”

Show Your Work, Austen Kleon (189)

^ ^ ^

The designer Stefan Sagmeister swears by the power of the sabbatical–every seven years, he shuts down his studio and takes a year off. His thinking is that we dedicate the first 25 years or so of our lives to learning, the next 40 to work, and the last 15 to retirement, so why not take 5 years off retirement and use them to break up the work years?”

Austen Kleon, Show Your Work (191)
rejection, submissions, Writing

IS DUOTROPE WORTH THE $5/MO SUBSCRIPTION FEE?

There are a lot of services out there for writers, and one of the ones you may have seen floating about (or not!) is Duotrope. Duotrope is a website for writers and editors that facilitates finding markets to send your fiction, and tracking your fiction submissions. It has one of the most comprehensive lists of genre markets I’ve found online, compared to other sites that piecemeal lists of magazines, anthologies, and contests. It provides statistical analysis of your writing submissions, how long certain markets took to respond, whether you received an acceptance or a rejection, and how often you’ve sent submissions to a specific market, among other metrics.

I came across Duotrope years ago, probably in my earliest attempts to start submitting fiction, along with Ralan.com, which was my primary go-to. Ralan.com is a great alternative, because it’s free, and pretty up-to-date, and Ralan does a solid job of curating his list, which means you don’t get a lot of tiny, just-for-exposure markets cluttering up his site. He organizes by pay-scale (Pro, Semi, Pay) and additional market type (antho, books). Having worked with him from the magazine end back in the days of The Zombie Feed, I can say he’s rather cranky, but fair, and he didn’t give me too much trouble when we had to update a listing. Duotrope is more hands-off, submit a form, get it approved type deal. Ralan’s got a personal touch.

The catch with Duotrope is that it requires subscription, if you want to get beyond the week-long free trial. You can subscribe for $5/month or $50/year, the latter thereby saving you a month’s subscription fee for the upfront cost. For years, I would dip into Duotrope for a couple months, pay the $5 on a when-I-need-it basis in order to get access to their search feature (truly one of the exemplary elements of Duotrope is their searchability based on genre, length, pay-rate, and title (if you’re looking for a specific market)), and then dip out again. For years, it really wasn’t worth it to me to pay $50/year just to have a searchable market list. Ralan’s could pretty much serve my searching purposes, provided I didn’t mind scanning the black-background/white text website, and I’ve had plenty of luck finding good markets via his lists.

But then something changed. I actually started submitting. Before, I might submit one or two stories a year and really helicopter-mom them: I’d fret over them and wait, and wait, and wait, and query when necessary, and it was easy enough to track them from market to market and not get into trouble by accidentally resending a story to a market that had already rejected it. But a couple years ago, I started really submitting. In 2019, I had over nine stories out for submission at any given time, and let me tell you, that will mess with your mind. It’s like juggling: sometimes Story 3 that just come back will be perfect for X market, but you’ve already got Story 5 story at X market (for the past 40 days), and you need to query X market to see if Story 5 is still being reviewed, if it got bumped to a shortlist, or if they never received it and/or it got lost, and X market requires you to wait 7-10 days before submitting a new story, so… If you’re at all like me, beyond two stories, the multiple moving parts start getting impossible to keep track of efficiently. Stories come back rejected, but you forget about them because the next market on the list for them is currently occupied, or temporarily closed to submissions, or has a please-wait-after-rejection clause, so it languishes un-submitted, and then seven months later, you’re like OH CRAP, I could have had this out months ago…

I used to track my fiction entirely by hand, which worked for a while. I’d write a list of markets, their expected response times, and pay-grade in one column, and then rank them by priority, often considering which market might be the best fit (if not always the #1 best paying) for a given story. Today, this is what my hand-written tracking notebook looks like (which I still use and update as I submit, but being a hardcopy, it’s not easily searchable, and things get lost in the pages):

Scribbling, chaotic, multi-color notes.

Each story you put out there becomes its own vector for complexity, and if you don’t have a very, very good system for keeping track of what’s submitted/on-hold/rejected/accepted/lost, it’s going to be nearly impossible to be efficient about deciding where Story 9 goes when it’s ready to launch.

THIS is when I recommend spending the $5/mo on Duotrope.

My favorite feature of Duotrope is their submissions tracker. It keeps a record of your submittable stories (title, length, genre, sub-genre), and a record of every market you’ve tried that story at. Each time you submit, you just jump on Duotrope, add a new submission to the tracker, and voila-! It keeps track of a market’s expected response time (how long they say it’ll take), average response time (how long it has actually taken for other submitters), and when to expect a response. It will highlight a submission’s wait-time in red text if you’ve waited longer than the average time and might need to query. It will generate lists of where each submission has gone already, what it’s responses were, and whether it made a market’s shortlist. This, I find, is the most invaluable element of Duotrope, because it makes it easy to see a list of your current submissions and their various statuses all in one glance.

I still utilitze Ralan.com often, because sometimes he gets faster tips from writers about market changes than Duotrope does (for example, if a favorite market is looking to start back up again, he may put a note on that listing), but Duotrope is my second brain for all submissions. I’ve yet to come across a market that was listed on Ralan that wasn’t listed on Duotrope also, but I like to cross-reference, and Ralan’s notes on a market can be helpful in deciding if it’s a worthy market to try for. I also still utilize my paper method of tracking, mostly for a place to compile itineraries, and then jotting down any personal rejection notes. But for juggling more than two submissions, Duotrope is an absolute life-saver and has saved me a lot of confusion and embarrassment.

What’s more, at the end of the year, I can generate a report that shows all my submissions for the year, or all my personal rejections for a year, or all my acceptances, or all my rejections, and that really helps me track my progress from year to year. In fact, last year, I used Duotrope’s tracker to compare my submission rate from 2019 to my all-time best from almost a decade before, and thanks to those reports, got a much better and more realistic view of how I’m doing in my career than I would have had just trying to guesstimate.

SO! TL;DR: If you’re currently submitting more than two or three stories at a time to various markets, and are starting to find it challenging to keep track of them, I would highly recommend Duotrope. If you’re only submitting one or two stories a year, it’s probably not necessary yet. Get yourself a good notebook for tracking and make use of Ralan.com for some top-tier listings. Note: Ralan.com is a genre list, so it won’t have many purely literary markets.

P.S. – A word of warning: If you’re still heavily utilizing the Writer’s Market annual book and you’re writing primarily genre fiction: cross-check. Writer’s Market was great before the internet, but nowadays, it seems to be out-of-date almost the instant its released. Many genre markets (and well-paying ones!) are online-only, and their submissions periods can change without warning. Some markets that exist at the beginning of the year when WM is published aren’t even around by mid-year. I highly, highly recommend–if you do use WM–make sure to check accuracy with Duotrope or Ralan.com (or, better yet, the market itself!) before submitting. You’ll save yourself (and the editors you want to impress) a lot of headache!

baby, Daily Check-In, Journal

Surfacing at Last

Wow. What a last few months it’s been! From Mo*Con at the beginning of May, to the hubby’s graduation from med school (Hooray!!!), to the Little Man’s first birthday & meeting the awesome Gene O’Neill for root beer floats, to the Little Man’s FIRST STEPS, to moving into our new place in Mass, to car/driver’s license registration, orientation, health insurance swapping, and tack on a sick cat, a couple book formatting projects, a brief but tremendous spike in Etsy shop traffic & sales, and half a dozen plus rejections paired with a brand new story sale (still somewhat secret–woo!)–deep gasping breath: you can see the kind of month(s) it’s been.

Needless to say, I’m digging out and finally surfacing. Writing has been, predictably, pretty sporadic these last eight weeks. There’s been quite a bit of novel-rewrite prep-work, note carding/plotting/etc., but not much for new words. But! I’m already planning to start a six month Chekhov plan (a short story a week, so a total of 26 drafts) to build up my editable (and subsequently, submittable) inventory again. Having a rush of new words, without worrying about editing or changing or fixing–maybe just focusing on one or two problem areas I tend to have (gripping beginnings, interesting PoVs, that sort of thing)–really helps me clear out the creative pipes. More often than not, I find few stories out of the batch that I really, really love (and sometimes a lot more). If nothing else, it tends to get the cliché, boring, or stupid ideas out of my head that won’t go away and are clogging up the idea storage bin in my head.

But things are just beginning to settle down. For the month of July, I need to 1) finish some plotting work on a novel rewrite, 2) retype a problematic short story that I need reviewed by a few talented writer-friends (because I sure as heck have no idea how to fix it…), and 3) start a fun, relaxing, totally non-publishing-worried story for a friend who needs a pick-me-up (and am SO excited about just writing something for someone specific to make them happy). There are a ton of other projects in the wings, and I’ve got to read more, but–*le sigh*. One thing at a time, one day at a time. At least the Little Man’s starting to go down at night so well that I can usually get a couple of hours to myself in the evenings. I’m thinking: writing time! :D

Over and out…for now…

But

Daily Check-In, editing, journa, Writing

Small Victories

Today in Mommy-Land

Trying to get back on the blogging horse! This morning, Andy, the Little Man, and I went out with my good friend K— to breakfast at Parker’s Maple Barn (deeeeelicious). Little Man had tastes of pancake, non-spicy sausage, potato fries, and french toast, which he loved very much. While K— and I caught up, he and Andy walked around. My mother got him some itty bitty baby shoes with good soles on them, and now that he’s discovered walking outside (it’s been so beautiful, weather-wise lately!), he almost never wants to stop. He looks so big wearing shoes! Like a proper toddler, and not much of a baby at all.

Yesterday, we took him to the library park for the first time, and he rode on the baby swings (pretty fun), sat on a wobbly thing (with support–kind of fascinating), spun on a whirligig with Mom (okay, kinda weird), and slid down a slide with Daddy (NOT FUN AT ALL, WHY ARE YOU TORTURING MEEEEE?!) Then we went to Mine Falls in Nashua, and walked around for quite a while. It was so beautiful out, and it’s been spoiling me something rotten to have Andy around mid-week. We figure we’ll soak it up now, since come July, I probably won’t see him for a year. XD

We also bought a pint of kumquats to try, since we’ve always toyed with the idea of getting a kumquat plant, but weren’t sure if we’d like it. I’m pleased to report, we do! They’re very citrusy–like an orange-lemon combo–with quite a tart kick, but very sweet, edible rinds. I, personally, prefer to remove the rind, since it has a way of sticking around in my teeth after I’ve eaten it, but otherwise, they’re quite tasty.

Today in Writer-Land

As is always the case when Andy’s around these days, I didn’t get any writing done yesterday, though I did start the retyping of a short story I’m editing on Monday, so that’s making slow but measurable progress. I also found out that one of my short stories, “Snap,” is being held at a really nice little small press publication, so fingers crossed on that one! Got two other rejections yesterday and today (rawr…), but got them both resubmitted this afternoon (yay!).

In keeping with the title, my small victory is this: I counted my total rejections from 2014 and 2015 (so far), and last year I got a total of 19 rejections, and so far just within the first four months of 2015, I’ve gotten 21! Now, this may not seem like a victory, but it is, and I’ll tell you why: in previous years (prior to 2014), I’m not sure I even submitted fiction 19 times. So that’s Victory #1. And then on top of that, I’ve already topped my 2014 total submissions, so I’m doing better than last year!

Here’s a question: What metrics–writing-wise–do you find helpful to track/keep a record of?

I’ve determined I need to focus more on competing with myself when it comes to writing, rather than constantly measuring myself up against more successful authors. For one, it’s not a fair measurement, because I only see the good things going on for them, and oftentimes they’ve been in the field a lot longer than I have. For two, it takes the focus off the writing, which is really the only thing I have control over. So I’m doubling-down on self-awareness and trying to be mindful about the kinds of discouraging thoughts that pop into my head on a near-constant basis. I also want to start tracking my own process metrics (total submissions, for example). I’ve been considering metrics like personalized-to-form rejections ratio from markets I submit to often, maybe word count (though that’s tricky with editing, which is most of what I’m doing these days), maybe length of project (how long it takes from when I start a new story vs. if/when I finish editing and submit it), etc. So what works for you/what data do you find interesting to follow?

It's all about the Data...
It’s all about the Data…

Journal

Wrestling the Bull

Today in Mommy-Land

*Phew!* Missed the last couple days because the hubby was home for an extended weekend, but we all had fun hanging out. The weather has been so nice, we’ve actually gotten out for walks! The Little Man’s nap schedule is still somewhat holding, though Monday was a little disrupted due to being out and about running errands out and about.

He’s started babbling even more lately, stringing lots of syllables together in almost sentences. It’s terribly cute! The monster growling isn’t as common, though, so that’s kind of sad. It’s amazing how quickly he goes through these vocalization phases. Whispering one week, clicking his tongue the next, monster growls, crescendo’ing screeches–it’s always changing. But it is fascinating to watch. He’s also just learned how to open cabinets, and has been pulling out all the non-breakable things (as the breakable things are up on the table now…)

But it’s so nice having Andy home during the week, and not just on weekends! I can cope with long-distance if we have to, but when he’s home at night, it’s like I can breathe better. :)

Today in Writer-Land

After a fairly unproductive weekend and week-start, I actually got a lot done today! During the Little Man’s first nap (short, about 40 minutes), I managed to retype the first two scenes of the current WiP, editing/smoothing as I went. Once I type in the next three scenes, then I’ll be able to send it off to one member of my crack team of beta-readers for critique. If I can get that good to go by the end of the week, that’ll be great!

During the second nap (much longer, about 2.5 hours!), I did a bunch of brainstorming and research on the Porter Short Story Challenge, and I think I’ve got it pegged. Mwahahaha! Oh boy, this is gonna be wacky, but maybe somewhat funny. Talk about writers-writing-about-writers-writing-about-writing Russian-nesting-dolls meta. Madness!

I also dove back into the summary draft of a novel that’s been playing around in my head for the past several years. I’m really liking where it’s going, though I also feel a bit like I’m wrestling a bull–the plot is sort of under control, but it could so easily break out of my grip and run amok. So we’ll see where that goes. I only know I love writing novel rough drafts this way. It’s the closest I’ve ever come to capturing that eager creative rush from my youth. Who knows what it will come to, but for now, I’m just having fun. :)

Journal

Back to Square One

Today in Mommy-Land

I swear, every time I start to get a little confident in my mothering skills, the Little Man throws me for a loop. It’s a weekly occurrence, now. What worked last week doesn’t work anymore. That nap that started seeming routine and awesomely long? Yeah, that’s gone now. Copious reading time? Yeah, no. I’ve been picking away at the same book for the past month. *le sigh*

Also seem to have some kind of bug, which I so *don’t* need right now. Plus the hubby’s back to his long-distance rotation (hopefully his last, but who knows?), so there’s that mental adjustment, too.

Today in Writer-Land

Very little happened here today. May have mentally fixed a problem the 4th scene was having, may scrap a character trait that–upon rewrite–feels a bit too forced. Over the weekend listed three important changes to make to the already rewritten portion, but haven’t implemented them yet.

I realize now that I have a tendency to try to change too much of the original story, which is a basic editing skills problem. Lately, I feel like I’ve jumped to a new level of development in my writing, only to realize I know *nothing* about writing. Ugh. I guess it’s good, but it sure is frustrating.

Also, my current year’s goals, in view of mobile baby, are looking pretty challenging to hit… *rawr*

baby, editing, rejection, submissions, Writing

Hot Potato

Today in Mommy-Land

Pretty standard day here in Mommy-Land, though I’m feeling much less hoarder-ish since I got the massive pile of laundry all tidied up Sunday. The Little Man took two naps–one about an hour and a half long (not bad), and one short forty-minute nap (meh) in bed. My mother also had a few minutes, so she watched him for a half-hour before his nap, which allowed me to get a little writing work started.

Also divided up the Little Man’s toys into three bins in the hopes that cycling through them from one day to the next will hold more of his interest. He’s quite inquisitive, but he exhausts things so quickly! We’ll see if the bin rotation helps.

Today in Writer-Land

Rejected. Rejected, rejected, rejected! *cries* Actually, I’m not super upset, but you know how it goes. I was really hoping this one would happen, especially since it’d gotten pushed up the editorial chain of command. But I did get a very nice and encouraging rejection notice, which I definitely appreciate (…as I wallow in self-pity).

tumblr_m6y9d5qgbj1qfckzwo2_500
“It was really, really good, but no thanks!”

That said, I got it right back out again like a hot potato, so the infinite game continues! (Ouch! It burns! Submit! Submit! Submit!)

Also got 650+ words of the second scene started for this month’s rewrite. Took me quite a bit of time–rereading Sunday’s work–to get my shoulders into the story, but I suspect that’s just from yesterday’s heavy-duty brainstorming. It left me a bit fuzzy-headed. Ah well, there’s always tomorrow. :)